top of page

The UPS and DOWNS of Content Creation

This is very meta; I’m writing about the thing I am doing at the same moment.

Although I consider myself a writer and novelist, what I have to confess I really am, in today's lingo, is a content creator. (But not an influencer, which seems like a euphemism for pitchman.)

I have several outlets for this content: three blogs (this one and two free ones.) A podcast. Several books out, including a popular OER on public speaking (not all my work, though). Research publications, and teaching materials.

Lots of effort, and very little audience and even less money!

Yet I keep doing it; and one has to keep doing it, or not do it at all. This morning, a Saturday, I have already posted eight "essays" to the Internet, and tonight I will revise my ninth novel. I hope to do three podcast interviews this week.

Ironically, I do not post to Twitter, Instagram, or Facebook very much or at all. Why?

Twitter is a cesspool of people who will attack you for anything. If I posted an innocuous photo of my dogs I would get criticism from some wise guy about their being neutered, or that Butter looks fat (he's not, I took him to the vet yesterday), or something. I really do not understand why people subject themselves to Twitter.

Facebook is about friends, and short posts. I like to finish an argument I'm making (or observations).

Instagram is about photos, which I have to borrow from Creative Commons usually.

YouTube: videos, and I don't want my mug plastered all over the place (it already is too much).

Snapchat: too ephemeral.

To be a content creator, one must create content. Regularly. As in several times a week. My podcast is on a hiatus and no one is listening. Folks only consume content that is fresh (sort of like a yellow banana v. a brown one).

To be a content creator, one must have something to say. Hey, that's me. I take the Constanza approach to Festivus here: "This is the airing of grievances--I have a lot of problems with you people, and you're going to here about 'em!"

To be a content creator, one must have something to say of benefit to others: (scratch that last one, then). And this is where I fail, often. If you want to read my "stuff" to know me or be entertained or get a different view, it's there. Only about half of them are of immediate or long-term informational benefit. Some I am just trying to be cute or funny, like my observations that "homeless pets" is an oxymoron, like jumbo shrimp or military security (I am writing this while a Chinese balloon flies over the Eastern U.S.!)

And finally, to be a content creator (a successful one), one must be a shameless and shameful self-promoter. It has to be one's life, one's calling card, one's identity, one's way of introducing oneself. I am not there.

I recently heard that editors in the past didn't believe a person could write a good novel until they have written a million words. Well, I have--much more than that. Probably two million of prose and fiction. So I should get my due, right?

Maybe soon. Colorful Crow Publishing likes me, they really like me, to quote Sally Field,and is publishing my eighth novel. I hope this is the beginning of a longer relationship.

8 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Observation on Annie Dillard's Writing Advice, Etc. I frequently listen to a podcast called THE HABIT. Its host is

Deconstructing Agatha Christie

I want to start this post with the clarification that I enjoy Agatha Christie immensely. I have watched all the David Suchet Hercule Poirot programs (some of which digress or depart from the Christie

Fiction Writing Revisited

Adverbs are your friend that you need to break up with. Another piece of advice fiction writers are told to follow is to remove adverbs from their writing. And in some cases, adjectives. This again sh


bottom of page